One of the major topics covered by the Anthropology of Media involves looking at both the political as well as social meanings found within media. A commonly reoccurring theme here is the effect that different media sources have on cultures and communities. There are no definite conclusions to this, however, by looking at the many different ethnographic cases involving media, we are able to gain some insight on this broad subject matter.
After reading many of the blog posts presented by my classmates, I was surprised at the diversity of responses in regards to the same given topics. One of the subjects that struck me as very interesting was that of Grafitti and its social and cultural implications. Similarly to the way that media forms such as the radio for example, have the ability to respond to or create communities, graffiti has also acted in this way. As many others had recognized, grafitti is far more than simply an outward, artistic expression. It is a forum for communication. The messages taken from graffiti can be direct and obvious, or they can be subtle and open for interpretation. Many bloggers for instance, chose to write about graffiti seen on the East side of Vancouver. The graffiti here is often political in reference to social class, or as Denise Lee argues, it can simultaneously be a symbolic source of pride and identity. As grafitti is often negatively stereotyped, it becomes a marker of different communities or groups within a given society. In reference to this, Chelsea Ousey states that grafitti is “accepted or rejected depending on the space” and is “regulated differently within various social spaces” (Ousey, 2011). Grafitti is far more prevalent in lower class communities such as East Vancouver, and often points out the issues that the people within these communities may be challenged with. In this sense, it brings them together as a collective. The well known East Van cross that Lee speaks to in his blog is an example of a symbol that “expresses “comradeship” in the face of adversity like poverty” (Lee, 2011).
Many individuals will approach the topic of graffiti with intention of justifying its classification as art. The blogs written by Lee and Ousey take on a slightly different perspective by looking at graffiti as a site of resistance and free expression. Most forms of media, such as television programs, films and magazines are controlled and have underlying agendas. Graffiti on the other hand, is created in the moment, by regular, every-day people who should have the right to have their voices heard. Whether or not the way they express this message is characterized as “artistic”, is another case. The messages that are spread through graffiti are often thought provoking and challenge ideas, politics and society in general. As an alternative media source, graffiti “loses its essence of resistance” (Cousey, 2011) when it becomes constrained by attempts to place it solely in the realm of art.
The Oxford American Dictionary defines media as “main means of mass communication”. The ideas communicated within these blogs show graffiti as an alternative media source that, while fitting this description, also stands for many other things.
Sources:
Lee, Denise
2011 The East Van Sign: Graffiti and Public Art in Creating an Imagined Community. http://deniseleesblog.tumblr.com/post/3291014858/the-east-van-sign-graffiti-and-public-art-in-creating, Accessed March 30, 2011
Chelsea, Ousey
2011 The Value in Graffiti. http://couseymedia.blogspot.com/2011/02/february-4-th-2011-historically.html, Accessed March 30, 2011.